What We Believe by Cannot Prove

글쓴이
베짱이
등록일
2005-12-12 15:59
조회
4,094회
추천
0건
댓글
0건
What do you believe is true, even though you cannot prove it?

이 질문을 세계의 지성 100명에게 물어서 대답을 얻었다고 합니다.

John Brockman is the PT Barnum of popular science. He has always been a great huckster of ideas. In the Sixties he got an MBA and then made his first fortune selling psychedelia to corporations, turning on marketing execs with 'multi-kinetic happenings' and showing them how their profits could levitate. These days he acts as literary agent for many of the world's greatest minds, including Richard Dawkins and Daniel Dennett, and achieves for some of them the kind of publishing advances that it takes great mathematicians to compute. The universe may be infinite, but Brockman still insists on his 15 per cent of it.

In order to help these floggable ideas to keep germinating, Brockman has set up a kind of global online Royal Society, called the Edge. The Edge promotes what he calls the Third Culture, a marriage of science and philosophy and even poetry, an alternative to CP Snow. This cross-fertilising club, the most rarefied of chat-rooms, has its premises on his website www.edge.org, which presents monthly interviews and debates with many of the world's foremost thinkers, who also happen to be, more often than not, his clients.
As a favour, perhaps, or because they are genuinely intrigued or flattered to be in the company of their peers, every year a good number of these thinkers respond to a question posed by Brockman. In 2004 the question was: 'What do you believe is true, even though you cannot prove it?'

The 100-odd responses to this question make up this book, which is compelling and repetitive by turns. Mostly, the correspondents are concerned with the two great time-honoured questions: is there life anywhere else in the universe? And, are we anything more than flesh and blood? Almost everyone, it appears, believes there is life elsewhere, but hardly anyone has truck with any notion of anything like an individual soul, or even a tangible 'I'. 'Mind', as John Dewey suggests, has become a verb, not a noun.

Despite this denial of a single self, there are plenty of formidable egos on display. Craig Venter, the man who tried to patent our DNA, the Book of Life, and make his fortune from it, believes that all life is a 'panspermic event'; that primordial microbes were sent in a directed rocket ship from an alien galaxy to colonise the earth, a big bang if ever there was one. We, in turn, are constantly pansperming, launching a zillion microbes back into space.

Others are slightly more circumspect. Kenneth W Ford is the retired director of the American Institute of Physics. He believes in the existence of life elsewhere because 'chemistry seems to be so life-striving'.

He also offers a couple of sobering thoughts. Microbes have occupied Earth for at least 75 per cent of its history; intelligent life for about 0.02 per cent of it.

He believes: 'Mars will be found to have harboured life and harbours life no more.' The effect of this on mankind, perhaps only a couple of years away, might be psychologically dramatic; more dramatic than 'Copernicus, Galileo, and Newton; perhaps even more so than the discovery of life elsewhere in the galaxy.'

Brockman characterises our times as the Age of Certainty, in that we are comfortable with materialism and Darwinism, and believe that science could unlock all of the world's mysteries, given enough time; our own version of monkeys and typewriters. Ian McEwan, the novelist and Edge thinker, in his introduction, suggests that we are not so far from the 'old Enlightenment dream of a unified body of knowledge, when biologists and economists draw on each other's concepts and molecular biologists stray into the poorly defended territory of chemists and physicists'.

This faith is striking, and it fervently ignores the contrary tide of superstition and fundamentalism across the world. Even as they are thinking the unthinkable, however, many of Brockman's correspondents, largely Americans, seem also to be arming themselves against a return to an age of uncertainty in which creationism and intelligent design hold sway in the public mind. Enlightenment and infinity are hedged around, these days, by the Holy Neocon Empire.

http://books.guardian.co.uk/reviews/scienceandnature/0,6121,1664357,00.html

목록
이전
유쾌한 이노베이션
다음
[책] 세 명의 사기꾼


책/영화/SF

게시판 리스트
번호 제목 글쓴이 등록일 조회 추천
359 [영화] 왕의 남자 댓글 6 한반도 01-09 4814 0
358 객관성의 칼날 읽어보신 분? 스카이워커 01-06 5328 0
357 Brokeback Mountain (2005) 댓글 1 돌아온백수 01-02 4332 0
356 [질문] 사다리걷어차기.. 댓글 2 델리-양 12-25 4794 0
355 수학과 확률에 관한 교과서 추천좀 부탁드리옵니다. 댓글 3 베짱이 12-23 6015 0
354 [책] 악령이 출몰하는 세상-과학,어둠속의 작은 촛불 댓글 9 rabyl 12-23 4858 0
353 KingKong(2005) 댓글 7 돌아온백수 12-18 5229 0
352 답변글 킹콩을 봐서는 안되는 이유... 댓글 2 한반도 12-21 5597 0
351 답변글 킹콩(2005) 속의 '과학적 구라' 댓글 24 임호랑 12-23 5556 0
350 유쾌한 이노베이션 댓글 2 뭘 봐? 12-18 4966 0
열람중 What We Believe by Cannot Prove 베짱이 12-12 4095 0
348 [책] 세 명의 사기꾼 fracas 12-08 5503 1
347 [책 추천] 생물학의 철학 댓글 2 보스 12-05 5195 0
346 (펌) 무대 뒤의 인생=(게임)개발자들이 사는 세상 과학사랑 11-26 4890 0
345 답변글 [re] 미래 기업 CEO는 게임광? 과학사랑 11-26 4039 0
344 답변글 [re] (펌) 인터넷 발표 후 출판, 그리고 베스트셀러 과학사랑 12-21 4196 0
343 T-G-I-F vs S-H-I-T 댓글 6 Simon 11-12 4882 0
342 [펌][만화] 포닭Blues (글그림:ozrics) 댓글 5 날고싶은정출연 11-09 6293 0
341 Prime 과 Shopgirl 돌아온백수 11-05 4351 0
340 Everything is illuminated (2005) 돌아온백수 10-29 4302 0


랜덤글로 점프
과학기술인이 한국의 미래를 만듭니다.
© 2002 - 2015 scieng.net
모바일 버전으로 보기